Anil Rijal v. Uscis

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANIL RIJAL, Individually, 
Petitioner-Appellant, No. 11-35249
v.
 D.C. No.
2:10-cv-00709-RAJ
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND
IMMIGRATION SERVICES, ORDER
Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Washington
Richard A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 4, 2012*
Seattle, Washington
Filed June 13, 2012
Before: Barry G. Silverman and Mary H. Murguia,
Circuit Judges, and Dolly M. Gee, District Judge.**
COUNSEL
Robert O. Wells, Jr., Mikkelborg, Broz, Wells & Fryer, Seat-
tle, Washington, for the petitioner-appellant.
Jeffrey M. Bauer, United States Department of Justice, Wash-
ington, D.C., for the defendant-appellee.
*The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
**The Honorable Dolly M. Gee, United States District Judge for the
Central District of California, sitting by designation.
6735
6736 RIJAL v. USCIS
ORDER
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:
Anil Rijal appeals the district court’s grant of summary
judgment in favor of the United States Citizenship and Immi-
gration Services, affirming the denial of his petition for an
immigration visa preference as an alien of “extraordinary abil-
ity” pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(1)(A). We adopt as our
own the well-reasoned published opinion of the district court,
Rijal v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Servs., 772
F.Supp. 2d 1339 (W.D. Wash. 2011).
AFFIRMED.