United States v. Victor Gonzalez Vazquez

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 21 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-30164
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00324-RAJ
v.
MEMORANDUM*
VICTOR M. GONZALEZ VAZQUEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Washington
Richard A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 19, 2019**
Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Victor M. Gonzalez Vazquez appeals from the district court’s order granting
in part, and denying in part, his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence
reduction. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Gonzalez
Vazquez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief,
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided
Gonzalez Vazquez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se
supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
2 18-30164