United States v. Stephon Jones

FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 21 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 11-10113
11-10114
Plaintiff - Appellee,
D.C. Nos. 3:03-cr-00284-MHP
v. 3:03-cr-00666-MHP
STEPHON JONES,
MEMORANDUM *
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
Marilyn H. Patel, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 19, 2011 **
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, Stephon Jones appeals from the 36-month
sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in
possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and from the 18-
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
month consecutive sentence imposed following revocation of supervised release.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Jones contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable given the
nature and circumstances of the offense and his personal history and
characteristics. The consecutive sentences below or within the respective
Guidelines ranges are substantively reasonable in light of the totality of the
circumstances and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(a) and
3583(e). See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007).
AFFIRMED.
2 11-10113