DocketNumber: 13-16968
Judges: Canby, Gould, Smith
Filed Date: 2/2/2015
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/6/2024
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 2 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DALE R. STEIN, No. 13-16968 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:11-cv-01243-JSW v. MEMORANDUM* G. WOODS, DDS; et al., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding Submitted January 21, 2015** Before: CANBY, GOULD, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Dale R. Stein, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his42 U.S.C. § 1983
action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious dental needs. We have jurisdiction under28 U.S.C. § 1291
. We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung,391 F.3d 1051
, 1056 (9th Cir. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2004), and we affirm. The district court properly granted summary judgment because Stein failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants were deliberately indifferent to his dental problems and associated pain. Seeid.
at 1057- 58 (a prison official acts with deliberate indifference only if he or she knows of and disregards an excessive risk to the prisoner’s health and safety; negligence and a mere difference in medical opinion are insufficient); Jackson v. McIntosh,90 F.3d 330
, 332 (9th Cir. 1996) (to establish that a difference of opinion amounted to deliberate indifference, a prisoner “must show that the course of treatment the doctors chose was medically unacceptable under the circumstances” and “that they chose this course in conscious disregard of an excessive risk to [the prisoner’s] health”); see also Peralta v. Dillard,744 F.3d 1076
, 1086-88 (9th Cir. 2014) (en banc) (official whose only role was reviewing internal appeal does not act with deliberate indifference absent knowledge of a substantial risk of serious harm). AFFIRMED. 2 13-16968