DocketNumber: 08-56403
Citation Numbers: 382 F. App'x 572
Judges: Canby, Thomas, Fletcher
Filed Date: 6/7/2010
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 07 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In the Matter of: PAUL HUPP, No. 08-56403 Debtor. D.C. No. 3:08-cv-00414-H-RBB PAUL HUPP, MEMORANDUM * Appellant, v. EDUCATIONAL CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Appellee, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Intervenor - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge, Presiding Submitted May 25, 2010 ** * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Hupp’s motion for oral argument is denied. Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. Paul Hupp appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order after a bench trial regarding discharge of Hupp’s student loans under11 U.S.C. § 523
(a)(8). We have jurisdiction pursuant to28 U.S.C. § 158
(d). We review de novo, Rifino v. United States (In re Rifino),245 F.3d 1083
, 1087 (9th Cir. 2001), and we affirm. The bankruptcy court properly determined that Hupp failed to establish that his current inability to repay the loans was likely to persist for a significant portion of the repayment period and that he had made a good faith effort to repay the loans. Seeid. at 1087
(outlining three-prong test for debtor to establish undue hardship under11 U.S.C. § 523
(a)(8)); see also, Educ. Credit Mgmt. Corp. v. Mason (In re Mason),464 F.3d 878
, 885 (9th Cir. 2006) (concluding that debtor had not met his burden of establishing good faith in attempting to pay back his loans because he had not maximized his income and had not made adequate efforts to obtain full-time employment despite his educational background). Hupp’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive. All pending motions are denied. AFFIRMED. 2 08-56403