DocketNumber： No. 05-74812
Judges： Bybee, Nelson, Silverman
Filed Date： 1/27/2006
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 11/5/2024
MEMORANDUM
Respondent’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is construed as a motion for summary disposition. So construed, the motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. See United States v. Baron-Medina, 187 F.3d 1144 (9th Cir.1999).
All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.