Yeager v. City of San Diego

MEMORANDUM ^**

F. Joe Yeager appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his Third Amended Complaint on numerous grounds. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Campos v. Nail, 940 F.2d 495, 496 (9th Cir.1991), and for failure to state a claim, Outdoor Media Group, Inc. v. City of Beaumont, 506 F.3d 895, 899-900 (9th Cir.2007).

We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s Order Dismissing Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint With Prejudice. Yeager’s contentions on appeal are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.