United States v. Aguilar-Delgado

MEMORANDUM ^**

Celestino Aguilar-Delgado appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea to illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for reasonableness sentences imposed after United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), see United States v. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, 441 F.3d 767, 769 (9th Cir.2006), and we affirm.

Aguilar-Delgado contends that his sentence was unreasonable because the district court failed to appropriately consider sentencing factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) that would have resulted in a more mitigated sentence. Our review of the record shows that the district court gave sufficient consideration to the sentencing goals and factors set forth in § 3553(a), and gave reasons why the specific sentence imposed was warranted in this case. See Rodriguez-Rodriguez, 441 F.3d at 771 (affirming sentence as reasonable where the record shows the district court considered the § 3553(a) factors and imposed a sentence that was sufficient but no greater than necessary to comply with § 3553(a)). Accordingly, the district court did not act unreasonably in imposing the sentence.

AFFIRMED.

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.