DocketNumber: Nos. 05-74793, 06-71277
Citation Numbers: 229 F. App'x 578
Filed Date: 4/25/2007
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/5/2024
MEMORANDUM
Humberto Salazar-Manzano, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’
We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that SalazarManzano failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003). SalazarManzano’s contentions that the IJ’s order violated his constitutional guarantees under the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses are unpersuasive. See Ram, 243 F.3d at 517; Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005). We therefore dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review in No. 05-74793.
We agree with the BIA’s conclusion that the performance by prior counsel did not result in prejudice to Salazar-Manzano, and thus his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel fails. See Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft, 339 F.3d 814, 826 (9th Cir.2003) (to prevail in an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a petitioner must demonstrate prejudice). We therefore deny the petition for review in No. 06-71277.
In No. 05-74793, PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
In No. 06-71277, PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.