Sevilla v. Mukasey

MEMORANDUM ^*

Claudia Galindo De Sevilla appeals a United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement decision to reinstate her pri- or removal order.

We do not have jurisdiction to review Galindo’s appeal of her April 2000 expedited order of removal.¹

The reinstatement order did not violate Galindo’s due process rights. In Morales-Izquierdo v. Gonzales,² we held that “[r]einstatement of a prior removal order— regardless of the process afforded in the underlying order—does not offend due process because reinstatement of a prior order does not change the alien’s rights or remedies.”³

Galindo’s claim that her removal order was invalid is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction and her petition for review of the reinstatement order is DENIED.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1 . See, e.g., Morales-Izquierdo v. Gonzales, 486 F.3d 484, 496 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc); Avendano-Ramirez v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 813, 818-19 (9th Cir.2004); Alvarenga-Villalobos v. INS, 271 F.3d 1169, 1170 (9th Cir.2001).

2 . Morales-Izquierdo, 486 F.3d at 496.

3 . See id. at 497.