Joseph Keys v. Whitney Bokosky

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 7 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSEPH LOUIS KEYS, No. 15-55775
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:15-cv-00240-JVS-JCG
v.
MEMORANDUM*
WHITNEY BOKOSKY,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 25, 2016**
Before: LEAVY, GRABER, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Joseph Louis Keys appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action alleging wrongful conduct by defendant, an Orange County
Deputy District Attorney, arising from a prior criminal conviction against Keys.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
court’s dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Crum v. Circus Circus
Enters., 231 F.3d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir. 2000). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Keys’s action for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction because Keys failed to allege facts sufficient to show that his claims
arose under federal law. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Republican Party of Guam v.
Gutierrez, 277 F.3d 1086, 1089 (9th Cir. 2002) (“federal jurisdiction exists only
when a federal question is presented on the face of plaintiff’s properly pleaded
complaint.” (internal citation and quotation marks omitted)).
AFFIRMED.
2 15-55775