DocketNumber: 08-71948
Citation Numbers: 409 F. App'x 163
Judges: , Beezer, Callahan, Tallman
Filed Date: 1/18/2011
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 8/3/2023
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 18 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WENCESLAO BAHENA-MARTINEZ, No. 08-71948 Petitioner, Agency No. A095-450-307 v. MEMORANDUM * ERIC H. HOLDER, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted January 10, 2011 ** Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. Wenceslao Bahena-Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under8 U.S.C. § 1252
. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider. Mohammed v. Gonzales, * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).400 F.3d 785
, 791 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review. In his opening brief, Bahena-Martinez fails to address, and therefore has waived any challenge to, the BIA’s April 29, 2008, decision denying his motion to reconsider. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,94 F.3d 1256
, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived). We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s underlying order dismissing Bahena-Martinez’s direct appeal because this petition for review is not timely as to that order. See Singh v. INS,315 F.3d 1186
, 1188 (9th Cir. 2003). Petitioner’s December 14, 2010, motion to file a corrected opening brief is granted. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part. 2 08-71948