DocketNumber: 18-60066
Filed Date: 4/13/2020
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/13/2020
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 13 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: ALAN M. BARTLETT; LUZ No. 18-60066 MARINA BARTLETT-MORAN, BAP No. 18-1093 Debtors, ------------------------------ MEMORANDUM* ALAN M. BARTLETT, Appellant, v. DAVID A. BIRDSELL, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellee. In re: ALAN M. BARTLETT; LUZ No. 18-60067 MARINA BARTLETT-MORAN, BAP No. 18-1096 Debtors, ------------------------------ ALAN M. BARTLETT, Appellant, v. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. CITIBANK, SOUTH DAKOTA, N.A., Appellee. Appeals from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Taylor, Brand, and Kurtz, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding Submitted April 7, 2020** Before: TASHIMA, BYBEE, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. Alan M. Barlett appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment dismissing as untimely his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s judgments in two adversary proceedings. We have jurisdiction under28 U.S.C. § 158
(d). We review de novo. In re Delaney,29 F.3d 516
, 517-18 (9th Cir. 1994). We affirm. The BAP properly concluded that Alan’s notices of appeal were untimely. See Fed. R. Bank. P. 8002(a) (providing that a notice of appeal shall be filed with the bankruptcy clerk within 14 days of the date of entry of the judgment, order, or decree appealed from); In re Delaney,29 F.3d at 517-18
(“The provisions of Bankruptcy Rule 8002 are jurisdictional; the untimely filing of a notice of appeal deprives the appellate court of jurisdiction to review the bankruptcy court’s order.” ** The panel unanimously concludes these cases are suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2 18-60066 18-60067 (internal citation omitted)). We reject as meritless Alan’s contentions that the certificates of service of the complaints in the adversary proceedings were invalid. See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7004(b) (providing that service in bankruptcy adversary proceedings may be made within the United States by first class mail). Alan’s motions for oral argument (Docket Entries Nos. 6 and 13) and for default judgment (Docket Entry No. 23) are denied. AFFIRMED. 3 18-60066 18-60067