June Johnson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 17 2020
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JUNE JOHNSON, No. 19-16176
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-02819-JJT
v.
MEMORANDUM*
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.;
UNKNOWN PARTIES,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
John Joseph Tuchi, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 14, 2020**
Before: CANBY, FRIEDLAND, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
June Johnson appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing her
diversity action alleging foreclosure-related claims. We have jurisdiction under 28
U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 640
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
(9th Cir. 2002). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing with prejudice
Johnson’s action because Johnson failed to comply with the district court’s order to
provide full and complete discovery responses, despite a warning that failure to
comply would result in dismissal. See id. at 642 (discussing factors to be
considered before dismissing an action for failure to comply with a court order).
AFFIRMED.
2 19-16176