DocketNumber: 19-71129
Filed Date: 7/23/2020
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/23/2020
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 23 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JULIO MARTINEZ MIRANDA, AKA No. 19-71129 Julio Salazar Maldonado, AKA Jose Edgar Salazar Miranda, Agency No. A201-223-345 Petitioner, MEMORANDUM* v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted July 14, 2020** Before: CANBY, FRIEDLAND, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges. Julio Martinez Miranda, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under8 U.S.C. § 1252
. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder,597 F.3d 983
, 986 (9th Cir. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2010). We deny the petition for review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Martinez Miranda’s motion to reopen, where he did not establish that the newly submitted evidence was previously unavailable. Seeid. at 986
(BIA may deny a motion to reopen for failure to introduce previously unavailable evidence). Martinez Miranda’s contention that the BIA failed to meaningfully address the claims in his motion is not supported. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 2 19-71129