DocketNumber: 11-10528
Judges: Reinhardt, Noonan, Hurwitz
Filed Date: 8/21/2013
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/6/2024
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 21 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10528 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:09-cr-01594-DCB- BPV-1 v. JOSE JAVIER REINA-VALENZUELA, MEMORANDUM* Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding Submitted August 16, 2013** San Francisco, California Before: REINHARDT, NOONAN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. Jose Reina-Valenzuela appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A)(viii), and importation of methamphetamine, in violation of21 U.S.C. §§ 952
(a), 960(a)(1), and 960(b)(1)(H). We have jurisdiction under28 U.S.C. § 1291
. Because the district court was apparently under the mistaken impression that Reina had transported 9.88 kilograms of methamphetamine rather than 5.807 kilograms, and because the district court relied upon the quantity of methamphetamine transported in imposing the sentence, we find procedural error. See Gall v. United States,552 U.S. 38
, 51 (2007); United States v. Carty,520 F.3d 984
, 993 (9th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, we vacate Reina’s sentence and remand for resentencing. When reconsidering the request for a minor role reduction, the district court should take into account the error regarding the quantity of drugs.1 In light of this disposition, we do not reach the other issues raised by Reina about his sentence. VACATED AND REMANDED. 1 Because the district court found Reina eligible for the “safety valve” under18 U.S.C. § 3553
(f), it is not constrained by the mandatory minimum sentence on remand. 2