United States v. Michael Cottrell

FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 21 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 11-30332
12-30103
Plaintiff - Appellee, 12-30227
v. D.C. No. 3:07-cr-00207-KI
MICHAEL THOMAS COTTRELL, a.k.a.
Michael Thomas Ellis, a.k.a. James Fuller,
a.k.a. William Paynter, a.k.a. Ronald
William Reddy,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Oregon
Garr M. King, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 14, 2013 **
Before: SCHROEDER, GRABER, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, Michael Thomas Cottrell appeals from the
district court’s orders revoking supervised release and the sentences imposed upon
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Cottrell’s
counsel has filed briefs stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with
motions to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Cottrell the
opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or
answering brief has been filed.
A review of the record indicates that these appeals are moot because Cottrell
has completed his custodial sentences and he is no longer serving a term of
supervised release. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 13-14 (1998); United States
v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999). We accordingly dismiss these
appeals.
Counsel’s motions to withdraw are GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
2 11-30332 & 12-30103 & 12-30227