United States v. Andre L. Smith, Also Known as Melik Fuller

38 F.3d 610

309 U.S.App.D.C. 35

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
UNITED STATES of America
v.
Andre L. SMITH, also known as Melik Fuller, Appellant.

No. 94-3101.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Sept. 9, 1994.

Before: BUCKLEY, HENDERSON and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

1

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 36(b). It is

2

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed June 21, 1994, be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in open court. The findings of the district court regarding appellant's dangerousness are supported by the evidence and are not clearly erroneous, United States v. Weissberger, 951 F.2d 392, 399 (D.C.Cir.1991), and the decision to hold appellant pending trial is supported by the record.

3

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 41.