Document Info
DocketNumber: 90-5257
Citation Numbers: 946 F.2d 1567, 292 U.S. App. D.C. 87, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 33620
Filed Date: 4/30/1991
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
-
946 F.2d 1567
292 U.S.App.D.C. 87
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Richard Allen TYREE and Joseph A. Bonacci, Appellants,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.No. 90-5257.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
April 30, 1991.
Before SILBERMAN, STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS and D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
1Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance and the opposition thereto, it is
2ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be granted substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its Memorandum Opinion filed April 18, 1990. The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to justify summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir.1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980).
3The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.