1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 JOHN DALTON, No. 1:19-cv-00374-DAD-SKO 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 11 DNC PARKS & RESORTS AT TENAYA LODGE, INC., et al., (Doc. 14) 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 On November 20, 2019, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with 16 prejudice.1 (Doc. 14 at 11–13.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, 17 see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), 18 and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this 19 case. 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Sheila K. Oberto Dated: November 21, 2019 /s/ . 23 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 1 The parties also requested that the Court “retain jurisdiction to enforce” their Settlement Agreement and Release, 26 filed concurrently with their stipulation. (See Doc. 14 at 12.) The Court in its discretion declines the parties’ request. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994); Camacho v. City of San Luis, 359 F. 27 App’x 794, 798 (9th Cir. 2009); California Sportfishing Prot. All. v. Agric. Mgmt. & Prod. Co., Inc., No. 2:14-cv- 02328-KJM-AC, 2016 WL 4796841, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 14, 2016) (noting that “the court in its discretion typically 28 declines to maintain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement.”).