NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of Appeals for the FederaI Circuit CY TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC AND MOBGOB, LLC, Plaintiffs/ C'0u,nterclaim Defen,dants-Appéllants, AND RICHARD YOON, SCOTT CHUNG AND TED CHUNG, Third P0srty Defen,dants-Appellees, V. _ GROUPON, INC., Defendcmt/Counterclaimant/T?zird Party Plain,tiff-Cross Appellcmt. 2011-1568, -1598 Appea1s from the United States District C0urt for the Central District of Ca1if0rnia in case n0. 10-CV-7287, Seni0r Judge Mariz.-ma R. Pfae1zer. ON MOTION ORDER CY TECH V. GROUPON 2 This court construes the letter from counsel for plainti;H`s and third-party defendants dated January 17, 2012, as a motion to reform the caption We also consider whether a special briefing schedule should issue. The appellants and appellees are represented by the same firm. The appellees (who state that they are in opposition to the cross-appellant only) should file a combined responsive brief with the appellants that responds to the cross-appellant's opening brief ' Upon consideration thereof, IT ls ORDERE:o THAT: (1) The motion is granted. The revised official cap- tion is reflected above. (2) The appellants and appellees must file a com- bined response brief in response to the cross-appellants opening brief. That combined response brief is due within 40 days of service of the cross-appellants opening brief and may not exceed 14,000 words. FoR THE CoURT 1 3 /sf Jan Horbaly Date 3 an Horbaly Clerk cc: AleXander C. D. Giza, Esq. David B. Abel, Esq. FlLED U.S. COUFIT 0 F APPEALS FOFl THE FEDERAL C|RCU|T FEB 13 2012 JAN HDRBAl.l CLERK s23