DocketNumber: 2008-5110
Citation Numbers: 426 F. App'x 916
Judges: Bryson, Linn, Prost
Filed Date: 8/17/2011
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 8/3/2023
NOTE: This order is nonprecede11tia1. United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit PASSAMAQUODDY TRIBE, Plaintiff-Appellant, - V. UNITED STATES Defendant-Appellee. 2008-5110 . Appeal from the Uni1;ed States C0urt of Federa1 C1aims in 06-CV-942, Judge Lynn J. Bush. ON MOTION Before BRYsoN, L1NN, and PRosT, Circuit Ju,dges. PROST, Circuit Judge. ORDER The United States moves to summarily affirm the judgment of the United St_ates Cour1; of Federa1 Claims in this case The Passamaquoddy Tribe responds and does not oppose affirmance The United States replies PASSAMAQUODDY TRIBE V. US 2 The Tribe filed a complaint in the Court of Federal Claims seeking damages against the United States for the alleged breach of its trust responsibilities. On the same day, the Tribe filed a similar complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The Court of Federal Claims dismissed the complaint, finding the Tribe’s suit barred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1500. The Tribe appealed to this court. This court stayed the briefing schedule in this appeal pending the United States Supreme Court’s disposition in United States v. Tohono O’odham Nati0n,131 S. Ct. 1723
(U.S.,2011). In its decision, the Supreme Court reversed this court’s decision in Tohono O’odham Nation u. United States,559 F.3d 1284
(Fed. Cir. 2009), concluding that under § 1500, the Court of Federal Clai1ns lacked jurisdic- tion over a suit when a suit based on substantially the same operative facts, regardless of the relief_sought, is pending in a district court. Summary affirmance of a case "is appropriate, inter alia, when the position of one party is so clearly correct as a matter of law that no substantial question regarding the outcome of the appeal exists." Joshuo: v. United States,17 F.3d 378
, 380 (Fed. Cir. 1994). In the present case, it is clear that summary affirmance is warranted Accordingly, IT ls OR:oER13D THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs. 3 PAssAMAQUo1)1)v minn v. Us FoR THE CoURT l -f /s/ Jan Horbal_v Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: Keith M. Harper Aaron P. Avila, Esq. 93 c0UR§_:Elil-,EFDFEALS FoR S2O THE FEDERAL ClRCUlT AUG 1 7 2011 .|AN HORBALY CLEHK ' lo