NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SOFTVIEW LLC, Appellant v. KYOCERA CORPORATION, MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC, Appellees ______________________ 2014-1599 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013-00004, IPR2013-00257. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ MORGAN CHU, Irell & Manella LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by SAMUEL KAI LU, ALAN J. HEINRICH. ERIC C. COHEN, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellee Kyocera Corporation. Also represented by MICHAEL TOMSA, MICHAEL ADAM DORFMAN. JOHN C. ALEMANNI, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Winston-Salem, NC, argued for appellee Motorola Mobility LLC. Also represented by ADAM HOWARD CHARNES; DAVID A. REED, CANDICE C. DECAIRE, ALYSON L. WOOTEN, WILLIAM HENRY BOICE, Atlanta, GA; CHRISTOPHER SCHENCK, Seattle, WA. JOSEPH MATAL, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, NATHAN K. KELLEY. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (WALLACH, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Cir- cuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 9, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court