In Re Harold Yen-Noy Davis

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
Wniteb ~tate~ 542 U.S. 367,
380-81 (2004).
Mr. Davis has not shown that the minimal delay here
justifies the drastic remedy of a writ of mandamus sought
in either of his two mandamus petitions.
Accordingly,
IT Is ORDERED THAT:
(1) The petitions for a writ of mandamus are denied.
(2) Mr. Davis's request for other various relief is
denied.
(3) The Secretary's motion is denied as moot.
INREDAVIS 4
FOR THE COURT
MAR 08 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk
cc: Harold Ven-Noy Davis
Jeanne E. Davidson, Esq.
Clerk, United States Court of Appeals for Veterans
Claims
s25 FILED
U.s. COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
'MAR (j 8 ZOlZ
JANHORBALY
ClBIK