DocketNumber: 2011-1249
Citation Numbers: 423 F. App'x 996
Judges: Gajarsa, Mayer, Prost
Filed Date: 6/15/2011
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/5/2024
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER, ARGUS GENETICS, LLC, AND MARS, INC., y Plaintiffs-Appellees, V. BIOPET VET LAB, INC. AN1) RADIO SYSTEMS CORPORATION (1:)oING BUs1NESs As 1=jETsAFE), Defendants-Appellants. in 2011-1249 Appeal from the United StateS District C0urt for the Eastern District of Virginia in case n0. 10-CV-616, Judge Raym0nd A. JackS0n. ON MOTION Bef0re GAJARSA, MAYER, and PROST, C.ircuit Judges. GAJARSA, Circu,1Lt Judge. ORDER BioPet Vet Lab, Inc. et a1. (Bi0Pet) move for a stay, pending appea1, of the preliminary injunction entered by FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER V. BIOPET VET 2 the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center et al. (FHCRC) oppose. BioPet replies In deciding whether to grant a stay or injunction, pending appeal, this court "assesses the movants chances of success on the merits and weighs the equities as they affect the parties and the public." E.I. Dupon,t de Nemours & C'o. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.,835 F.2d 277
, 278 (Fed. Cir. 1987); see also Standard Havens Pr0ds. v. Gen,cor Indus.,897 F.2d 511
(Fed. Cir. 1990). To preVail, a movant must establish a strong likelihood of success on the merits or, failing that, must demonstrate that it has a substantial case on the merits and that the harms factors militate in its favor. Hilt0n U. Braunskill,481 U.S. 770
, 778 (l987). Without prejudicing the ultimate disposition of this case by a merits panel, we conclude based upon the papers submitted that BioPet has not met its burden of showing the requisite likelihood of success to obtain a stay of the preliminary injunction pending appeal. Acc0rdingly, IT ls ORDERED TH.AT: The motion for a stay, pending appeal, of the prelimi- nary injunction is denied. FoR THE CoURT 1 5 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: Marc Louis Delf1ache, Esq. Gregory N. Stillman, Esq. S23 THE FEDERAL ClRCUlT JUN 15 2011 JAN HDRBAl.Y CLEHi Fl LED v.s. comm 0F APPEALs ma