Choi v. United States

Case: 12-5111 Document: 14 Page: 1 Filed: 09/20/2012
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
ijliniteb ~tate1l 17
F.3d 378, 380 (Fed. Cir. 1994). There, we explained that
the Court of Federal Claims "has no jurisdiction to adjudi-
cate any claims whatsoever under the federal criminal
code[.]" Id. at 379. In summarily disposing of the appeal
in Joshua, we stated that the position of the government
in arguing that the Court of Federal Claims lacked juris-
diction was "so clearly correct as a matter of law that no
substantial question regarding the outcome of the appeal
exists." Id. at 380. So too here, summary affirmance of
the judgment of the Court of Federal Claims in dismissing
Mr. Choi's complaint is appropriate.
Accordingly,
IT Is ORDERED THAT:
(1) The judgment of the Court of Federal Claims is
summarily affirmed.
(2) All pending motions are dismissed.
(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.
FOR THE COURT
SEP 20 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk
eotJL'F'l~PEALS
u.sTHe FEDERAl. CIRCUITFOR
SEP 20 ZulZ
JAN HORBAlY
CLERK
Case: 12-5111 Document: 14 Page: 4 Filed: 09/20/2012
DANNY CHOI V. US 4
cc: Danny Choi
Douglas T. Hoffman, Esq.
s25