Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. Philips Electronics North America Corp.

' 7 .. ________._______ ____ __ ___ _L: ,_
"' '1'- -‘F- -;.L! !E! ;;4;;;;L
;_n_ in _ __: n - _" n or-"' ":;_’_"_"_‘E :_'¥‘=*``*""="=-:§§"éE‘=."f"5=_£%EEE=-_== =_. _
' ""'-¢'-9 1- _ -;.___T_ _-_-_vv_-;_-.- ==-_-_ _______ _ ____.___-_
- - \J];V\.)1l. \¢\Jl.I.UI.\.I.C{G.lJL\n1r l.)I.1.\$.l.C\JL,
___ ____ ____ __. ._._._.___._.._._._ ____ _15£Ei_Et._£fj_H:U_p_éI£ant’ _
V.
PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA
CORPORATION, 4
Defen.dcmt,
AND
UNIVERSAL LIGHTING TECHNOLOGIE'S, INC.,
Defen,dcmt-Appellee.
2012-1015
Appea1 from the United StateS DiSt1'ict C0urt for the
N0rthern District of Texas in case n0. 09-CV~0029, Judge
Reed O’C0nn0r.
LIGHTING BALLAST CONTROL LLC,
Plain,tiff-Appellee,
V.
'~ `` - "``-1 ' - §§
wl
:"§§i``;`` =_.=':‘=’ii =_:=_.=:~;i_-:; ii ; . _ = =
L__
. . . .
__ - ~ _ _ ,: 5 rain-;: -_‘-_ _ _
``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````~ ``2o1~2:~Ior4````````````
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
N0rthern District of Texas in case no. 09-CV-0029, Judge
Reed O’Connor.
ON MOTION
ORDER ``
Lighting Ballast Control, LLC moves to voluntarily
dismiss its cross appeal no. 2012-1015, and for the due
date of its principal brief to remain as March 16, 2012.
Upon consideration thereof
IT ls ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motion to dismiss 2012-1015 is granted. Ap-
peal No. 2012-1015 is dismissed The revised official
caption in 2012-1014 is reflected aboVe.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs in 20l2~10l5.
(3) The motion concerning the due date for Lighting’s
brief is granted The brief is due March 16, 2012.