NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE ARACHNID, INC., ____________________ 2011-1431 (Reexamination No. 90/010,097) ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ STEPHEN M. HANKINS, Schiff Hardin LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for appellant. On the brief were JAMES P. MURPHY and DAVID Z. PETTY, McAndrews Held & Malloy, Ltd. of Chicago, Illinois. FRANCES M. LYNCH, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and LYNNE E. PETTIGREW, Associate Solicitor. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (BRYSON, MAYER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 9, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk