In Re Bilski

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-1130
(Serial No. 08/833,892)
IN RE BERNARD L. BILSKI
and RAND A. WARSAW
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals
and Interferences.
Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, MAYER, LOURIE, RADER, SCHALL,
BRYSON, GAJARSA, LINN, DYK, PROST, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
ORDER
This case was argued before a panel of this court on October 1, 2007.
Thereafter, a poll of the judges in regular active service was conducted to determine
whether the appeal should be heard en banc.
Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The court by its own action grants a hearing en banc. The parties are requested
to file supplemental briefs that should address the following questions:
(1) Whether claim 1 of the 08/833,892 patent application claims patent-
eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101?
(2) What standard should govern in determining whether a process is patent-
eligible subject matter under section 101?
(3) Whether the claimed subject matter is not patent-eligible because it
constitutes an abstract idea or mental process; when does a claim that
contains both mental and physical steps create patent-eligible subject
matter?
(4) Whether a method or process must result in a physical transformation of
an article or be tied to a machine to be patent-eligible subject matter under
section 101?
(5) Whether it is appropriate to reconsider State Street Bank & Trust Co. v.
Signature Financial Group, Inc., 149 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1998), and
AT&T Corp. v. Excel Communications, Inc., 172 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir.
1999), in this case and, if so, whether those cases should be overruled in
any respect?
This appeal will be heard en banc on the basis of the original briefs and
supplemental briefs addressing, inter alia, the issues set forth above. An original and
thirty copies of all briefs shall be filed, and two copies served on opposing counsel. The
parties shall file simultaneous supplemental briefs which are due in the court within 20
days from the date of filing of this order, i.e., on March 6, 2008. No further briefing will
be entertained. Supplemental briefs shall adhere to the type-volume limitations for
principal briefs set forth in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32 and Federal Circuit
Rule 32.
Any amicus briefs will be due 30 days thereafter. Any such briefs may be filed
without leave of court but otherwise must comply with Federal Rule of Appellate
Procedure 29 and Federal Circuit Rule 29. Oral argument will be held on Thursday,
May 8 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 201.
FOR THE COURT
February 15, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk
cc: David C. Hanson, Esq.
Stephen Walsh, Esq.
2007-1130 -2-