Nike v. Meitac International Enterprise Co., Ltd

Error: Expected the default config, but wasn't able to find it, or it isn't a Dictionary
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-1070
NIKE, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MEITAC INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISE CO., LTD.
and MAN LEE MO,
Defendants-Appellants,
and
IN SHOE, INC.,
Defendant.
ON MOTION
Before BRYSON, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and PROST, Circuit
Judge.
PROST, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
Nike, Inc. moves to dismiss this appeal because Meitac International Enterprise
Co., Ltd. et. al. (Meitac) has failed to file their opening brief. Meitac has not responded.
A party’s failure to comply with the court’s rules, including the requirements of
preparing and filing briefs, can result in dismissal of an appeal for failure to prosecute.
Julien v. Zeringue, 864 F.2d 1572, 1574 (Fed. Cir. 1989).
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motion is granted.
(2) All sides shall bear their own costs.
FOR THE COURT
March 19, 2007 /s/ Sharon Prost
Date Sharon Prost
Circuit Judge
cc: Erik S. Maurer, Esq.
Ronald M. St. Marie, Esq.
s19
ISSUED AS A MANDATE: ______________________
2007-1070 2