DocketNumber: Sac. No. 2122.
Citation Numbers: 147 P. 1171, 170 Cal. 8, 1915 Cal. LEXIS 344
Judges: Shaw
Filed Date: 4/7/1915
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/2/2024
This action in all except two particulars, is the same as the action of Brown v. Brown, (Sac. No. 2121), *Page 9 ante, p. 1 [
The only difference between this case and the other case above mentioned, is that here the property is personal property while there it was real estate, and here it consists of an insurance policy which had become the property of Brown before the action for divorce was begun. In consequence of the date of its acquisition by Brown, said policy, if it was community property, was in existence as such at the time the action for divorce was begun. Upon the principles laid down in case No. 2121, aforesaid, it would follow that the judgment of divorce, based upon the complaint declaring that there was no community property, is a conclusive determination against the plaintiff that this property is not community property, and by said judgment she is estopped from claiming any interest whatever in this part of the estate of Brown.
The judgment is reversed.
Sloss, J., and Angellotti, C.J., concurred.