DocketNumber: S132433
Citation Numbers: 110 P.3d 1217, 28 Cal. Rptr. 3d 2
Judges: George
Filed Date: 4/27/2005
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 3/3/2016
Supreme Court of California.
Petition for review granted; issues limited
Petition for review GRANTED.
The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to the following: If the standing limitations of Proposition 64 apply to actions under the Unfair Competition Law that were pending on November 3, 2004, may a plaintiff amend his or her complaint to substitute in or add a party that satisfies standing requirements of Business and Professions Code section 17204, as amended, and does such an amended complaint relate back to the initial complaint for statute of limitations purposes?
GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN, and MORENO, JJ., concur.
Chamberlan v. Ford Motor Co. , 369 F. Supp. 2d 1138 ( 2005 )
Madrid v. Perot Systems Corp. , 130 Cal. App. 4th 440 ( 2005 )
Standfacts Credit Services, Inc. v. Experian Information ... , 405 F. Supp. 2d 1141 ( 2005 )
Paulus v. Bob Lynch Ford, Inc. , 139 Cal. App. 4th 659 ( 2006 )
Harris v. Investor's Business Daily, Inc. , 138 Cal. App. 4th 28 ( 2006 )