DocketNumber: No. 1122
Citation Numbers: 1 Cal. Unrep. 326
Judges: Currey, Rhodes, Sanderson, Sawyer, Shatter
Filed Date: 12/17/1866
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023
This ease was submitted in connection with People v. Seale and People v. Chan. The leading facts are similar, and the judgment might have been affirmed but for the fact that a mistake has occurred in entering the judgment, by which a much larger sum has been recovered than was demanded in the complaint or found due by the court. The complaint alleges and the court finds the amount of the tax assessed to be seventy-three dollars and one cent, while the judgment rendered is for three hundred and thirty-eight dollars and sixty-two cents and costs of suit. This is clearly an error, but the record furnishes the data for correcting it.