DocketNumber: L. A. 19873
Citation Numbers: 31 Cal. 2d 254, 188 P.2d 17, 1947 Cal. LEXIS 238
Judges: Traynor, Edmonds, Schauer
Filed Date: 12/30/1947
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/2/2024
I concur in the conclusion that the revenue which is here in controversy may not be used for general municipal purposes. But I again call attention to the impropriety of a “friendly suit” by which only the city and one of its officers litigate a question of great public interest. (Paso Robles etc. Hospital Dist. v. Negley, 29 Cal.2d 203 [173 P.2d 813]; City of Whittier v. Dixon, 24 Cal.2d 664, 668 [151 P.2d 5, 153 A.L.R. 956]; City and County of San Francisco v. Boyd, 22 Cal.2d 685, 707 [140 P.2d 666]; City and County of San Francisco v. Linares, 16 Cal.2d 441, 448 [106 P.2d 369].)