Smith v. Idaho Quartz Mining Co.

By the COURT.

The court was justified by the evidence in finding that the plaintiff was not the owner of the premises upon which the wood and timber had been cut, and had no interest in the premises other than as security, and that he was not the owner of the wood and timber, and that the wood was cut by parties in the possession of the premises under a claim of title adverse to plaintiff. Under such circumstances, the alleged errors as to other matters are immaterial. Judgment affirmed.