Judges: DANIEL E. LUNGREN, Attorney General
Filed Date: 11/21/1997
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
DANIEL E. LUNGREN Attorney General ANTHONY M. SUMMERS Deputy Attorney General
TOM J. BORDONARO, JR., MEMBER OF THE CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY, has requested an opinion on the following question:
Are the operations of a composting facility subject to the waste discharge requirements of the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act as administered by a Regional Water Quality Control Board?
In addressing the issues presented, we first note that compost is the product resulting from the controlled biological decomposition of organic wastes which have been separated from other solid wastes. (Pub. Resources Code, §
We also preliminarily note that a composting facility is subject to the permit requirements of an entirely separate statutory scheme, the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (Pub. Resources Code, §§
Although the issuance of solid waste facility permits comes under the administrative purview of the Waste Management Board, the Legislature has declared that such permitting authority does not limit or affect the powers and duties of a Regional Water Board or the State Water Board. (Pub. Resources Code, §
". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
"(c) It is . . . the intent of the Legislature, in enacting this chapter, and in making the necessary revisions to this division and Division 7 (commencing with Section
13000 ) of the Water Code by the act enacting this chapter, to accomplish all of the following:"(1) . . . the [integrated waste management] board, the state water board, and the regional water boards shall retain their appropriate statutory authority over solid waste disposal facilities and sites. A clear and concise division of authority shall be maintained in both statute and regulation to remove all areas of overlap, duplication, and conflict between the board and the state water board and regional water boards, or between the board and any other state agency, as appropriate.
"(2) The state water board and regional water boards shall be the sole agencies regulating the disposal and classification of solid waste for the purpose of protecting the waters of the state . . ., and the [integrated waste management] board and the certified local enforcement agencies shall regulate all other aspects of solid waste disposal within the scope of their appropriate regulatory authority.
". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
"(d) It is the intent of the Legislature, in enacting this chapter, and in making the necessary revisions to this division and Division 7 (commencing with Section
13000 ) of the Water Code, to ensure that the state minimum standards for environmental protection at solid waste disposal facilities are not reduced." (Italics added.)
With the relationship between these statutory schemes in mind, we return to the question whether the operations of a composting facility are exempt from the Act's waste discharge requirements as administered by a Regional Water Board. Generally, every person discharging waste (other than into a community sewer system) that could affect the quality of the waters of the state must file a report of waste discharge with the appropriate Regional Water Board. (§
The sole basis for the claim that the operations of the composting facility in question are exempt from the requirements of the Act is the exemption language contained in an administrative regulation, California Code of Regulations, title 27, section
"Recycling or other use of materials salvaged from waste, or produced by waste treatment, such as scrap metal, compost, and recycled chemicals, provided that discharges of residual wastes from recycling or treatment operations to land shall be according to applicable provisions of this division."
We reject the suggestion that the manufacturing operations of a composting facility fall under the exemption language of this regulation. "Recycling," as that term is used in the regulation, refers not to the manufacturing process of creating compost; rather, it refers to the use of compost as a final product. Under the plain wording of the regulation, the compost must first be "salvaged from waste, or produced by waste treatment" before it can be subject to "[r]ecycling or other use."
"Generally, the same rules of construction and interpretation that apply to statutes govern the construction and interpretation of an administrative agency's rules and regulations." (Industrial IndemnityCo. v. City any County of San Francisco (1990)
Moreover, the regulation expressly requires that "discharges of residual wastes from recycling or treatment operations to land shall be according to applicable provisions of this division." It is this aspect of the composting process that the State Water Board and a Regional Water Board must regulate pursuant to the Act's provisions, monitoring and controlling the amount of leachates that might migrate into the waters of the state during the compost manufacturing process.
Although the operations of a composting facility are not exempt from the Act's waste discharge requirements, a Regional Water Board has the authority to waive such requirements "as to a specific discharge or a specific type of discharge where the waiver is not against the public interest." (§
We conclude in answer to the question presented that the operations of a composting facility are subject to the waste discharge requirements of the Act as administered by a Regional Water Board; however, the Regional Water Board may waive such requirements if the particular circumstances so warrant.