DocketNumber: Civ. No. 1359.
Citation Numbers: 143 P. 559, 25 Cal. App. 802
Judges: THE COURT. —
Filed Date: 7/21/1914
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023
The parties to the above entitled cause having stipulated that the appeals from the two judgments rendered in the said action in favor of the respondent C. L. Tilden present questions identical to those presented in the appeals in the case, No. 1359, Anderson v. Nawa et al., (opinion filed July 17, 1914), ante, p. 151, [
Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered upon the authority of the said case (No. 1359), and for the same reasons stated in the opinion filed therein, the first judgment, to wit, the judgment entered and recorded January 14, 1913, in favor of said respondent C. L. Tilden, is affirmed, and the appeal from the second judgment, to wit, the judgment entered and recorded February 14, 1913, is dismissed.
Hilty v. State , 386 So. 2d 1236 ( 1980 )
Home Insurance Co. v. Mathis , 109 Ind. App. 25 ( 1941 )
McKenzie v. Trav. F. Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn , 239 Ky. 227 ( 1931 )
Repp v. American Farmers Mut. Auto Ins. Co. , 179 Minn. 167 ( 1930 )
State v. Lake , 99 Mont. 128 ( 1935 )
Rapaport v. American Central Ins. Co. , 137 Wash. 236 ( 1926 )