P. v. Ortega CA4/1

Filed 4/26/13 P. v. Ortega CA4/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, D062488
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v. (Super. Ct. No. SCD239769)
ERIKA ORTEGA,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Laura W.
Halgren, Judge. Affirmed.
I.
INTRODUCTION
Erika Ortega pled guilty to one count of attempted arson of an inhabited structure
(Pen. Code, §§ 664/451, subd. (b))1 and two counts of felony child abuse (§ 273a, subd.
(a)). The trial court sentenced Ortega to the midterm of four years on count 2 and
imposed concurrent terms on the other counts. We affirm the judgment.
1 Further statutory references are to the Penal Code.
II.
BACKGROUND
Ortega was charged with one count of attempted arson of an inhabited structure
(§§ 664/451, subd. (b); count 1); three counts of felony child abuse (§ 273a, subd. (a);
counts 2, 3, 4); two counts of false imprisonment (§ 236; counts 5, 6); one count of arson
of property (§ 451, subd. (d); count 7); one count of false reporting of an emergency
(§ 148.3, subd. (a); count 8); and one count of false reporting of a crime to a police
officer (§ 148.5, subd. (a); count 9).
Pursuant to a plea bargain, Ortega pled guilty to counts 1, 2, and 3 in exchange for
a sentence to be determined by the court, and dismissal of the remaining charges. The
court had indicated that it would not impose a sentence longer than six years.
As the factual basis for her plea, Ortega admitted to willfully, maliciously and
unlawfully attempting to set fire to and burn an inhabited structure (count 1), and to
willfully injuring and causing her two children to be inflicted with unjustifiable pain and
suffering (counts 2 and 3).
The trial court denied probation and sentenced Ortega to the midterm of four years
on count 2, which the court selected as the principal term. The court imposed a four-year
concurrent term on count three, and a two-year concurrent term on count 1.
Ortega filed a timely notice of appeal.
Ortega's appointed appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende
(1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende). We invited Ortega to file a brief on her own behalf, but
she has not responded.
2
III.
DISCUSSION
Ortega's counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks this court to review
the record for error, as mandated by Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to Anders v.
California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel lists as a possible, but not arguable,
issue: "Is appellant's negotiated plea in exchange for [an] indicated maximum sentence
of six years constitutionally valid?"
A review of the record pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders,
supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the possible issue listed pursuant to Anders, has disclosed
no reasonably arguable appellate issues. Ortega has been competently represented by
counsel in this appeal.
IV.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
AARON, J.
WE CONCUR:
NARES, Acting P. J.
McDONALD, J.
3