DocketNumber: No. 522-78
Citation Numbers: 220 Ct. Cl. 729
Judges: Davis, Kashiwa, Kunzig
Filed Date: 6/29/1979
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/23/2022
On June 29, 1979 the court entered the following order:
This Wunderlich Act case is before the court solely on plaintiffs motion to dismiss defendant’s counterclaim. Upon the basis of the parties’ submissions and other papers, but without oral argument, we deny plaintiffs motion to dismiss defendant’s counterclaim and remand the case to the trial division for further proceedings.
Plaintiffs contract to furnish banner tow targets to the United States Navy was terminated for default in August 1973. Arguing instead for a termination for convenience, plaintiff appealed to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (Board), which affirmed the default termination, Piasecki Aircraft Corp., ASBCA No. 18783 (Nov. 17, 1977). Plaintiffs appeal to this court has met with defendant’s counterclaim for unliquidated progress payments, $18,897, under the terms of the terminated contract’s clause, "Special Provisions Regarding Default,” ASPR 7-104.35(h), FPR l-30.510-l(h). Plaintiff moves for dismissal of defendant’s counterclaim on the ground that defendant failed to file the administrative record with the court within the
Accordingly, if is therefore ordered that plaintiffs motion to dismiss defendant’s counterclaim is denied and the case is remanded to the trial division for further proceedings.