DocketNumber: No. 173-80C
Citation Numbers: 227 Ct. Cl. 535
Judges: Bennett, Nichols, Smith
Filed Date: 3/3/1981
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/23/2022
This Wunderlich Act case concerns, in part, plaintiffs entitlement to consideration of its request for an exception to the Buy American Act provisions
The case comes before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff asserts that the administrative decision is unsupported by substantial evidence. Additionally, plaintiff argues that the decision "contains errors of law” concerning the correct application
Defendant argues that the administrative decision correctly applies the Buy American Act to the facts of this case and that the decision is supported by substantial evidence. Defendant does not oppose, however, plaintiffs suggestion that the cross-motions be referred to a trial judge. Because defendant expresses no opposition to this suggestion, because the legal issues raised concerning the Buy American Act appear to be of first impression, and because plaintiff challenges several fact-findings in the administrative decision, we believe it appropriate to refer the cross-motions to a trial judge.
rr is therefore ordered, pursuant to Rule 54(a), that the cross-motions for summary judgment are referred to the trial division for an opinion and recommendation for the conclusion of law by a trial judge.
The Buy American Act is codified at 41 U.S.C. §§ 10a-10d (1976).