Judges: KEN SALAZAR, Attorney General
Filed Date: 9/8/1999
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
ANSWER: Yes. A local electorate may vote to alter or abolish term limits for local officials through a referendum or initiative proposed on an odd year ballot.
Under the Colorado Constitution, all political power derives from the people and is vested in them. Colo. Const. art
Pursuant to the power of initiative, Colorado voters passed a measure limiting the terms of elected officials of political subdivisions. Colo. Const. art.
The voters of any such political subdivision may lengthen, shorten or eliminate the limitations on terms of office imposed by this Section 11. The voters of the state may lengthen, shorten, or eliminate the limitations on terms of office for the state board of education or the governing board of a state institution of higher education imposed by this Section 11.
This provision does not prescribe the means by which voters within a political subdivision may alter the term limits of their elected officials.
The means by which voters of political subdivisions may alter term limits are governed by Colo. Const. art.
The initiative and referendum powers reserved to the people by this section are hereby further reserved to the registered electors of every city, town, and municipality as to all local, special, and municipal legislation of every character in or for their respective municipalities. The manner of exercising said powers shall be prescribed by general laws; except that cities, towns and municipalities may provide for the manner of exercising the initiative and referendum powers as to their municipal legislation. Not more than ten percent of the registered electors may be required to order the referendum, nor more than fifteen percent to propose any measure by the initiative in any city, town, or municipality. When interpreting constitutional provisions, such as this, words must be given their natural and popular meaning. Tivolino Teller House, Inc. v. Fagan,
926 P.2d 1208 (Colo. 1996). The Colorado Constitution must be read as a whole document. Zaner v. City of Brighton,899 P.2d 263 (Colo.App. 1994) aff'd917 P.2d 280 (Colo. 1996). An interpretation which harmonizes different constitutional provisions is favored. Bickel v. City of Boulder,885 P.2d 215 (Colo. 1994).
Discussion
Colo Const. art
The term "manner" means "a way, mode or method of doing anything, or mode of proceeding in any case or situation."Black's Law Dictionary 963 (6th ed. 1990). In the case of local initiatives and referenda, the mode of proceeding includes the time at which elections may be held.
This interpretation is confirmed by other provisions within art V, § 1 which delineate procedures for placement of statewide initiatives on the ballot. The procedures include time deadlines for completion of certain tasks, including the time at which a vote on propositions may be held. Hearings on statewide initiated matters must be held at a general election. Colo. Const. art.
Section 1(9) of article V delegates to the general assembly the authority to set the time for presenting initiated matters, except that cities, towns and municipalities may set the time for their respective jurisdictions. Nothing in the constitution limits the elections at which local initiatives may be held.
The general assembly has established times for holding elections on initiatives of political subdivisions. The registered electors of a municipality may vote on an initiated petition (other than one brought pursuant to Colo. Const. art
Issued this 8th day of September, 1999.
KEN SALAZAR Attorney General