Judges: J.D. MacFARLANE, Attorney General
Filed Date: 2/22/1977
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Lorraine A. Reininger Pueblo County Treasurer Pueblo, Colorado 81003
Dear Lorraine:
I have your letter and request to join in an "Interrogatory Question" to the Supreme Court. Without discussing the substance of the question, the use of interrogatories in this matter does not appear to be the proper way to proceed.
QUESTION PRESENTED AND CONCLUSION
Does Article
My conclusion is "no."
ANALYSIS
Section
The Supreme Court shall give its opinion upon important questions upon solemn occasions when required by the governor, the senate, or the house of representatives.
In the recent case of In Re Senate Resolution No. 9,
We know of no case in which this court has answered interrogatories concerning the validity of construction of a statute which has already been adopted. "Legislative questions must be connected with pending legislation. (Citations omitted.)
I assume that the court would follow its recent precedent, and thus would suggest, in the alternative, that the Assistant County Attorney consider filing a declaratory judgment action.
I'm sorry I cannot be of any further help, but I do feel that this proposed use of the Interrogatory is inappropriate under the court's recent interpretation.
SUMMARY
Article
Very truly yours,
J.D. MacFARLANE Attorney General
COURTS
Colo. Const. art.
LAW, DEPARTMENT OF Office of Attorney General LEGISLATIVE BRANCH GOVERNOR, OFFICE OF
Article