Judges: J.D. MacFARLANE, Attorney General
Filed Date: 11/7/1979
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Dr. Calvin M. Frazier, Commissioner Colorado Department of Education State Office Building, Fifth Floor 201 East Colfax Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203
Dear Dr. Frazier:
QUESTION PRESENTED AND CONCLUSION
You have requested an attorney general's opinion on the following question:
Can local school districts levy additional mills of property tax beyond that provided by the Public School Finance Act for the purpose of establishing self-insurance pools for liability and property insurance as specified in C.R.S. 1973,
For the reasons which follow, I have concluded that school districts may levy additional mills of property tax beyond that provided by the Public School Finance Act to establish self-insurance reserve funds.
ANALYSIS
School districts are expressly authorized to establish self-insurance pools for liability insurance (C.R.S. 1973,
These insurance reserve funds are to be legally distinct and separate entities, and are to be "kept separate and apart from all other funds." C.R.S. 1973,
Having determined that these self-insurance reserve funds are separate and distinct funds, and are not related to the authorized revenue base funding of the Public School Finance Act, the next question is the effect of the language in C.R.S. 1973,
The limitation in C.R.S. 1973,
(1) Except as otherwise provided, all statutory tax levies when applied to the total valuation for assessment of the state, each of the counties, cities, and towns not chartered as home rule, and each of the fire, sanitation, irrigation, drainage, conservancy, and other special districts established by law, shall be so reduced as to prohibit the levying of a greater amount of revenue than was levied in the preceding year plus seven percent except to provide for the payment of bonds and interest thereon.
In analyzing this provision, it is clear that it does not apply to school districts. This analysis is confirmed by a review of its history. Prior to 1969, this provision, then C.R.S. 1963, 88-3-1(1), expressly applied to school districts. In 1969, an amendment removed school districts from its coverage. The limitations applicable to school districts are found in the Public School Finance Act, and related statutes. The entire mechanism of the Public School Finance Act, with the authorized revenue base formula, further emphasizes the conclusion that the seven percent limitation in C.R.S. 1973,
It is a well settled rule of statutory construction that when two statutes concern the same legislative scheme, they should be read together to reasonably effect the legislative intent.See e.g., People in Interest ofM. K. A.,
In view of the prior language of C.R.S. 1973,
Because the seven percent limitation does not apply to school districts, and because on its face it restricts the entire amount of property tax revenue raised by the taxing jurisdiction, the legislative result is that school districts are not subject to the seven percent limitation in levying property taxes to finance self-insurance reserve funds.
The limitation imposed by C.R.S. 1973,
SUMMARY
Therefore, it is my opinion that local school districts are authorized to levy additional mills of property tax beyond that provided by the Public School Finance Act for the purpose of establishing self-insurance reserve funds.
Very truly yours,
J.D. MacFARLANE Attorney General
SCHOOL DISTRICTS INSURANCE TAXATION AND REVENUE
C.R.S. 1973,
EDUCATION, DEPT. OF Administration
School districts may levy additional mills of property tax beyond that provided by the Public School Finance Act to establish self-insurance reserve funds.