Augat v. Tetmeyer

Certain items of the defendant's counterclaim were allowed in reduction of the amount claimed by the plaintiff; others were disallowed. The finding conclusively settled every matter in dispute, save an item of interest amounting to something over $4, which it is claimed the court erroneously allowed. This did not justify an appeal, and our disposition of the case is manifestly controlled by Neville v. Frary,88 Conn. 50, 89 A. 882, and the earlier cases there referred to.

There is no error.