DocketNumber： SC 17574
Citation Numbers： 889 A.2d 819, 276 Conn. 929, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 562
Filed Date： 12/14/2005
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 11/3/2024
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Frederick W. Fawcett, supervisory assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.
Alexander H. Schwartz, special public defender, in opposition.
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 92 Conn.App. 110, 883 A.2d 1257 (2005), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Whether the Appellate Court properly held that the trial court's charge on conspiracy was deficient because it did not set forth an essential element, the object of the conspiracy?"
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17574.
Krol v. A v. Tuchy, Inc. , 135 Conn. App. 854 ( 2012 )
Ertel v. Rocque , 108 Conn. App. 48 ( 2008 )
McKeon v. Lennon , 131 Conn. App. 585 ( 2011 )
State v. Casiano , 282 Conn. 614 ( 2007 )
Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. Charles , 95 Conn. App. 315 ( 2006 )
State v. Delgado , 323 Conn. 801 ( 2016 )
Ribeiro v. Fasano, Ippolito & Lee, P.C. ( 2015 )
State v. Parker , 295 Conn. 825 ( 2010 )
Kaye v. Housman , 184 Conn. App. 808 ( 2018 )
State v. Tabone , 301 Conn. 708 ( 2011 )
State v. DeJesus , 276 Conn. 929 ( 2005 )
Mark v. Neundorf , 147 Conn. App. 485 ( 2014 )
State v. Rivera , 282 Conn. 779 ( 2007 )
State v. DeJesus , 282 Conn. 783 ( 2007 )
State v. Sanchez , 282 Conn. 787 ( 2007 )