DocketNumber： 18181
Citation Numbers： 953 A.2d 653, 288 Conn. 908, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 315
Filed Date： 7/9/2008
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 11/3/2024
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
James R. Fogarty, Greenwich, in support of the petition.
The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 107 Conn.App. 796, 946 A.2d 889 (2008), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly decline to apply the mode of operation rule as articulated in Meek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 72 Conn.App. 467, 806 A.2d 546, cert. denied, 262 Conn. 912, 810 A.2d 278 (2002), to this slip and fall case?"
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18181.
Humphrey v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. , 107 Conn. App. 796 ( 2008 )
Jarrett v. Commissioner of Correction , 288 Conn. 910 ( 2008 )
Santos v. Commissioner of Correction ( 2018 )
Tatum v. Commissioner of Correction ( 2022 )
Lewis v. Commissioner of Correction ( 2022 )
Johnson v. Commissioner of Correction ( 2014 )
Santos v. Commissioner of Correction , 186 Conn. App. 107 ( 2018 )
Jarrett v. Commissioner of Correction , 288 Conn. 910 ( 2008 )
Humphrey v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. , 295 Conn. 855 ( 2010 )
Anderson v. Commissioner of Correction , 114 Conn. App. 778 ( 2009 )
Miller v. Commissioner of Correction , 116 Conn. App. 357 ( 2009 )
Grant v. Commissioner of Correction , 121 Conn. App. 295 ( 2010 )
Pommer v. Commissioner of Correction , 125 Conn. App. 519 ( 2010 )
Brunetti v. Commissioner of Correction , 134 Conn. App. 160 ( 2012 )
Jones v. Commissioner of Correction , 169 Conn. App. 405 ( 2016 )
State v. Ruiz-Pacheco ( 2021 )