DocketNumber： SC 18784
Citation Numbers： 17 A.3d 1043, 301 Conn. 902, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 198
Filed Date： 4/27/2011
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 11/3/2024
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Michael A. Zizka, Hartford, in support of the petition.
Proloy K. Das and Glenn E. Coe, Hartford, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 127 *1044 Conn.App. 125, 14 A.3d 386 (2011), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that a zoning board may not deny a permit for a plan that complies with local zoning regulations but differs materially from that presented in a previously approved variance application?"
Ayuso v. Commissioner of Correction ( 2022 )
Hinds v. Commissioner of Correction ( 2014 )
R & R Pool & Patio, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals , 129 Conn. App. 275 ( 2011 )
White v. Commissioner of Correction , 182 Conn. App. 188 ( 2018 )
Thompson v. Commissioner of Correction , 184 Conn. App. 215 ( 2018 )