State v. DeFrancesco

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 34 Conn. App. 741 (AC 12700), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the defendant’s conviction for possession of a hybrid bobcat on the ground that General Statutes § 26-40a was not unconstitutionally vague as applied to the facts of this case?”

Decided December 12, 1994 Michael J. Graham, in support of the petition. Jack W. Fischer, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.