Citation Numbers: 157 A. 271, 114 Conn. 716, 1931 Conn. LEXIS 27
Judges: Avery, Banks, Haines, Hinman, Maltbie
Filed Date: 12/8/1931
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/3/2024
The plaintiff while crossing a street in Stamford was struck by an automobile being driven by the defendant Algieri as the servant and agent of the defendant Hayes. The finding, which cannot be corrected in any material respect, states that before crossing the street the plaintiff looked in the direction from which the automobile was coming and saw it, but that it was so far away that he could reasonably expect to cross in safety. Believing this to be so he continued across the street without looking again until he was within two feet of the further curb when he was struck. He cannot be held to have been guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. Porcello v.Finnan,
There is no error.
Giannatasio v. Nealon , 117 Conn. 696 ( 1934 )
Rosen v. Goldstein , 128 Conn. 605 ( 1942 )
Gardiner v. Hayes , 128 Conn. 332 ( 1941 )
Caines v. Wofsey , 117 Conn. 671 ( 1933 )
Skovronski v. Genovese , 124 Conn. 482 ( 1938 )
Scofield v. Fannie Spelke , 119 Conn. 699 ( 1935 )
Olsen v. Genalsky , 121 Conn. 340 ( 1936 )
Lutzen v. Henry Jenkins Transportation Co. , 14 Conn. Supp. 121 ( 1946 )
Kelly v. Devittorio , 2 Conn. Supp. 39 ( 1935 )