DocketNumber: 2854
Citation Numbers: 3 Conn. App. 249
Filed Date: 2/12/1985
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 9/8/2022
This is an appeal
At oral argument, the defendant conceded that the trial court could reasonably have reached the decision that it did. It is well settled, in domestic relations cases, that this court does not find facts. “Our function is to decide whether the decision of the trial court was ‘clearly erroneous in view of the evidence and pleadings in the whole record . . . .’ ” Gallo v. Gallo, 184 Conn. 36, 38, 440 A.2d 782 (1981).
The second argument, raised for the first time at oral argument, is that General Statutes § 46b-81 (a) and (c) are unconstitutional. The case was not tried
There is no error.
This appeal, originally filed in the Supreme Court, was transferred to this court. General Statutes § 51-199 (c).
The defendant claims, as a third issue, that the trial court was biased against her. We find this argument to be totally without merit.